Thread:Java55555Obeseman/@comment-5242951-20131016043838/@comment-5242951-20131021003954

Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons.

Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons.

Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons.

Masonmancini wrote: Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. Masonmancini wrote: But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons. But he trust the professor, and in Buck's story Exorcist is seen as bad, while in his story, professor is good since he revived him. Then at the end buck/exorcist gets "helped" by the exorcist/buck and kill the professor for making powerful demons.